For nonprofits, agency staff and legislative offices

Everything runsdownhill.

Pollution scores, state designations and regulated sites for every California tract. Live from the agencies that publish them.

How it works
Scroll
01

California ranks every tract.

9,000-odd tracts, 23 measures each, ranked against each other.

CalEnviroScreen 5.0, OEHHA i
02

The rank decides who is designated.

CalEPA designates disadvantaged communities from them. 35% of climate investment must reach priority populations.

SB 535 designation, 2026 i i
03

Six of the measures are counts of sites.

The score says how many. The map says which, with each site's EPA file.

EPA Facility Registry Service i
04

When a source closed, what changed?

After 8 California power plants retired, nearby preterm births fell from 7.0% to 5.1%. The map shows results like this. It doesn't forecast.

Casey et al., 2018 i

Who it's for

People who fund, plan or argue for places.

Writing a grant

  • Whether a tract is designated, and on which criterion
  • Residents and designated share for a whole service area
  • A tract table to attach, sources in the header

Briefing a member

  • Assembly, Senate and Congressional district for any point
  • One summary for a district, county or AB 617 community
  • A brief to paste, with limits and citations attached

Working on a site

  • Every regulated site within 1 to 10 km, each linked to its EPA file
  • What was measured after similar closures elsewhere
  • Where runoff from the site travels, and roughly how fast

Serving tribal communities

  • Tribal lands from three federal boundary sources
  • Designated in their own right, not through a tract score
  • Flagged where a tract is far larger than the land inside it

Limits

What this can't tell you.

A score is a rank, not a reading.

95 means the tract sits above 95% of California tracts on that one measure. It isn't a concentration of anything.

It isn't the record of designation.

It reads CalEPA's published list. Before applying for funding, confirm on CARB's Priority Populations map.

No forecasts.

No "remove this facility" button. Ranks are relative, site measures are counts rather than emissions, and OEHHA rules out before-and-after use.

Studies are from elsewhere.

They show what was measured after real closures. They don't predict a number for a site here.

Sites and scores overlap.

Six measures are counts of facilities, so a site next to a high score is partly circular.

No property prices.

A price next to a facility invites a causal reading the data can't back. Housing burden is already one of the 23 measures.

No health claims.

CalEnviroScreen is a screening tool. OEHHA says it can't assess risk to a person or an address.

What's loaded.

Fetched live when the page opens.

0
tracts scored i
0
designated tracts i
0
tribal land areas i
0
AB 617 communities i

Every layer, and where it comes from.

Open the map and check it yourself.

Search an address, county or district.

Layers

Legend

Loading

The interactive map cannot run here

The data below still works. Every record, source and caveat is the same as the map version. Only the map canvas is missing.

Downhill

Table view. The interactive map needs WebGL, which this environment does not provide, so the same records are listed here instead.